Same-day endorsements on a 4 000-vehicle book
A commercial fleet brokerage consolidated four systems onto one platform, and took endorsement turnaround from nine days to the same afternoon.
This is a sample study written to show the shape our case studies take. The client is anonymised and the figures are illustrative rather than measured. Our first published client study is in progress.
Endorsement turnaround
9 days → same day
Time from client request to endorsed cover in force
Claim cycle time
38% shorter
First notification of loss through to settlement
Systems in daily use
4 → 1
Retired three standalone tools and their reconciliations
Renewal retention
+6 points
Measured across two full renewal cycles
Illustrative UI only. Data and individuals shown are fictitious; any resemblance to real persons or data is coincidental.
Illustrative UI only. Data and individuals shown are fictitious; any resemblance to real persons or data is coincidental.
Illustrative UI only. Data and individuals shown are fictitious; any resemblance to real persons or data is coincidental.
The starting point
A brokerage running just over four thousand commercial vehicles across a handful of insurers. The policy schedule lived in one system, claims in another, commission in a spreadsheet, and correspondence in inboxes. Every fleet change meant touching all four, and reconciling them at month end took two people the better part of a week.
What was actually hurting
Not the software, but the gaps between it. A client adding six vehicles would wait days while the schedule, the insurer submission and the debit order were updated separately. Nobody could answer what a vehicle was covered for on a given date without opening three systems, and claims were routinely logged against cover that had since been endorsed.
What changed
The fleet moved onto a single versioned policy structure, with each vehicle as its own asset record carrying its registration, accessories and claim history. Endorsements became records rather than overwrites, so the schedule as it stood on any date stayed answerable. Referrals to insurers routed through configured approval flows instead of email chains, and commission calculated on the record rather than in a workbook.
What it took
A phased migration over one quarter, starting with the policy and asset data and leaving claims until the schedule was trusted. The reconciliation spreadsheet was kept running in parallel for two months as a check, then retired once the numbers matched three months running.
How we measure this
Every rollout starts by writing down what the current numbers are (turnaround times, cycle times, how many systems a task touches) before anything changes. The comparison at the end is against that baseline, not against a memory of how things used to feel.
Book a demo ➝